Content
Here, the substantive question was about the efficacy of integrated CBI over single-disorder or other usual care interventions. Aim two examined these effect sizes in subgroups by follow-up time point, type of contrast condition and targeted disorder. Given the clinical heterogeneity of our sample (i.e. a range of substance use and mental health conditions), potential clinical and methodological moderators of effect size variability were explored. The pooled effect estimates were additionally examined in sensitivity analyses (i.e. publication bias).
The question to be addressed in treatment is how contingencies can be arranged to encourage initial experiences of abstinence and entry into non-drug activities. When this goal is achieved, treatment becomes concerned with identification of more naturally-occurring rewards for abstinence (e.g., greater employment, relationship, and social success). As such, problem solving strategies and programming and rehearsal of steps to broader goal attainment may need to be provided, depending on the skills available to the patient. As implied above, CBT for substance use disorders varies according to the particular protocol used and—given the variability in the nature and effects of different psychoactive substances—substance targeted. Consistent across interventions is the use of learning-based approaches to target maladaptive behavioral patterns, motivational and cognitive barriers to change, and skills deficits.
How CBT Works for Substance Use
Candidate variables were entered in participant (i.e., age, sex, race, primary drug, substance use severity), implementation, (i.e., treatment length, treatment delivery), and methodological (i.e., study risk-of-bias) blocks. Analyses were conducted with Wilson’s (2005) METAREG for Maximum Likelihood regression (ML; SPSS Version 24), and variables with significant regression coefficients were placed into a final predictive model along with residual variance estimates. Missing variable codes for regression covariates were mean imputed, and a predictor was removed from the analysis if imputed values reached 20% of total cases (Pigott, 1994). We conducted sensitivity analyses throughout data analysis and considered heterogeneity and moderator analyses as two primary methods for examining effect size validity. Trimmed estimates with influential studies removed (Baujat, Mahé, Pignon, & Hill, 2002) were also provided.3 Finally, to test for potential publication bias, the relationship between error and effect size was assessed using rank correlation (Begg & Mazumdar, 1994) and graphical methods (Egger, Smith, Schneider, & Minder, 1997).
Symptoms of substance dependence reflect more internal consequences of use such as physical withdrawal upon discontinuation of a substance and difficulty with cutting down or controlling use of a substance. This narrative review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in the peer-reviewed literature between 2010 and 2020 did not involve the participation of human subjects; as such, no ethical approval was required. This curriculum is a structured curriculum intended for individuals with cognitive behavioral interventions for substance abuse a recent pattern of interpersonal violence who are moderate to high risk on a general risk assessment. We’ve tried, tested, and written unbiased reviews of the best online therapy programs including Talkspace, BetterHelp, and ReGain. This way, people can manage their feelings of anxiety or depression in positive ways, rather than turning to substance misuse for a quick fix. People may examine the situations, emotions, and thoughts that played a role in their drug or alcohol use.
Case Conceptualization and Functional Analysis
The evidence supporting CBT has been generated from single-site studies, as well as from some of the landmark multisite studies of addiction treatment, including Project MATCH and Project COMBINE for alcohol (Anton et al., 2006; Project MATCH Research Group, 1997), the NIDA Cooperative Cocaine Treatment Study (Crits-Christoph et al., 1999), and the Marijuana Treatment Project (MTP Research Group, 2004). One of the distinguishing features of CBT has been its relative durability of effects, with significant treatment effects persisting through a follow-up period, in some cases with individuals showing greater improvement after treatment ends (i.e., ‘sleeper effect’) (e.g., Carroll et al., 2000; Carroll et al., 1994b; Rawson et al., 2002). Cognitive behavioral therapy can be a highly effective choice for treating alcohol and substance use disorders. It can be used on its own or combined with other approaches that work together to support a person’s long-term recovery. However, it is not the only option out there, so talk to your healthcare provider about what’s available to decide what approach is best for your needs.
When non-specific therapies or usual care were the contrast, the pooled effect size was small to non-significant. In this review, non-specific contrasts were typically either treatment as usual (e.g., Bowen et al., 2014; McKay et al., 2010; Morgenstern, Blanchard, Morgan, Labouvie, & Havaki, 2001; Papas et al., 2011) or conditions designed to account for non-specific https://ecosoberhouse.com/ therapy factors (e.g., supportive therapy [Burtscheidt, Wölwer, Schwarz, Strauss, & Gaebel, 2002]; didactic education [Kivlahan et al., 1990]). Modest relative efficacy in contrast to these conditions underscores how little we know about the specificity of CBT ingredients when delivered to populations with alcohol or other drug use disorders.
Leave a Reply